<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple proposes &#8216;blank&#8217; iPod/phone/MacBook just add buttons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons</link>
	<description>this, that and the other</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hrmpf.com - &#187; Multitouch Keyboard coming to MacBooks (or MacBook mini)</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-52985</link>
		<dc:creator>hrmpf.com - &#187; Multitouch Keyboard coming to MacBooks (or MacBook mini)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-52985</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What iPhone has going for it &#171; alll about latest computer stuff</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-32043</link>
		<dc:creator>What iPhone has going for it &#171; alll about latest computer stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-32043</guid>
		<description>[...] Button-less modular designIt looks like Apple could take an interesting approach to the iPhone&#8217;s form factor. A new patent filing hints that Apple may allow a button-less touchscreen iPod to transform into a phone by simply adding a sleeve of sorts. Seems like a bit of a reach to me, but potentially promising at the same time. Apple has just filed a new patent application for the adding of physical controls (like buttons or slides etc) to the touch sensitive surfaces of electronic devices. Apple seems to propose that you take a â€˜blankâ€™ iPod and add a wheel for a standard iPod, add a keypad to make it a phone - add a joystick to make it a game machine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Button-less modular designIt looks like Apple could take an interesting approach to the iPhone&#8217;s form factor. A new patent filing hints that Apple may allow a button-less touchscreen iPod to transform into a phone by simply adding a sleeve of sorts. Seems like a bit of a reach to me, but potentially promising at the same time. Apple has just filed a new patent application for the adding of physical controls (like buttons or slides etc) to the touch sensitive surfaces of electronic devices. Apple seems to propose that you take a â€˜blankâ€™ iPod and add a wheel for a standard iPod, add a keypad to make it a phone - add a joystick to make it a game machine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-27647</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 23:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-27647</guid>
		<description>Finally.  Does this mean I can finally put a two button trackpad on my Mac?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally.  Does this mean I can finally put a two button trackpad on my Mac?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple proposes &#8216;BLANK&#8217; iPod/phone/MacBook&#8230;.Just Add Buttons</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple proposes &#8216;BLANK&#8217; iPod/phone/MacBook&#8230;.Just Add Buttons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-6409</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple has just filed a new patent application for the adding of physical controls (like buttons or slides etc) to the touch sensitive surfaces of electronic devices. Apple seems to propose that you take a &#8216;blank&#8217; iPod and add a wheel for a standard iPod, add a keypad to make it a phone - add a joystick to make it a game machine&#8230;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story  Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple has just filed a new patent application for the adding of physical controls (like buttons or slides etc) to the touch sensitive surfaces of electronic devices. Apple seems to propose that you take a &lsquo;blank&rsquo; iPod and add a wheel for a standard iPod, add a keypad to make it a phone - add a joystick to make it a game machine&#8230;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story  Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-5037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-5037</guid>
		<description>This is one of the worst ideas I've seen recently.

For one, as was already stated, this strays far from Apple's 'simpler is better'. A system like this would add unneeded complication when there are already very simple solutions. A touchscreen is a simple, flat, fully-contained device that will allow much of the functionality most users need for specialized software.

The article did bring up the issue of input feedback. For example, if you had a piano keyboard on your touchscreen you would likely not be very satisfied with the results, as there is no way to feel a key being pressed. My opinion holds that the solution to this is an external keyboard. No, you can't easily lug it to the park, or on a flight to compose, but those are inherent limitations of mobile computers. We have to accept that there are some uses that mobile computers are great for, and others that should stay at your desk.

I'd be thrilled if there were a good system for accomplishing these specialized tasks mobiley, I'm not against the idea - it's just that this patent application does not hold the key.

I've given my opinion, but not yet supported it, so allow me to describe the main practical hindrances to the proposed system.

The biggest thing is the physical complication. No matter what approach is taken, there is physical complication added to your device. Moving parts are something we try to cut down on as much as possible on electronic devices for one main reason: they break. These things will break, they will get accidentally broken off, damaging your notebook. Moving parts = bad.

The second thing that came to mind was attaching my piano keyboard, or worse, joystick, and inadvertently shutting the lid of my mobile, or someone bumping it closed. Imagine the horrid scratches that would make their way onto most people's screens. Even if it's not my screen that gets axed, just having an object protrude from the smooth faces of my notebook would be outrageous. Over time there is bound to be something that comes along and hits this thing - knocking it off and breaking the "mount" or whatever method used to attach it.

All in all what I seem to be telling myself is simply that more physical complication is bad. The more we can remove from the physical body of mobile devices the better.

Besides all that, my 13" MacBook is 13" for a reason - I can carry it around easily without a bag or case. It wouldn't be practical for many people to carry modules with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the worst ideas I&#8217;ve seen recently.</p>
<p>For one, as was already stated, this strays far from Apple&#8217;s &#8217;simpler is better&#8217;. A system like this would add unneeded complication when there are already very simple solutions. A touchscreen is a simple, flat, fully-contained device that will allow much of the functionality most users need for specialized software.</p>
<p>The article did bring up the issue of input feedback. For example, if you had a piano keyboard on your touchscreen you would likely not be very satisfied with the results, as there is no way to feel a key being pressed. My opinion holds that the solution to this is an external keyboard. No, you can&#8217;t easily lug it to the park, or on a flight to compose, but those are inherent limitations of mobile computers. We have to accept that there are some uses that mobile computers are great for, and others that should stay at your desk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be thrilled if there were a good system for accomplishing these specialized tasks mobiley, I&#8217;m not against the idea - it&#8217;s just that this patent application does not hold the key.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve given my opinion, but not yet supported it, so allow me to describe the main practical hindrances to the proposed system.</p>
<p>The biggest thing is the physical complication. No matter what approach is taken, there is physical complication added to your device. Moving parts are something we try to cut down on as much as possible on electronic devices for one main reason: they break. These things will break, they will get accidentally broken off, damaging your notebook. Moving parts = bad.</p>
<p>The second thing that came to mind was attaching my piano keyboard, or worse, joystick, and inadvertently shutting the lid of my mobile, or someone bumping it closed. Imagine the horrid scratches that would make their way onto most people&#8217;s screens. Even if it&#8217;s not my screen that gets axed, just having an object protrude from the smooth faces of my notebook would be outrageous. Over time there is bound to be something that comes along and hits this thing - knocking it off and breaking the &#8220;mount&#8221; or whatever method used to attach it.</p>
<p>All in all what I seem to be telling myself is simply that more physical complication is bad. The more we can remove from the physical body of mobile devices the better.</p>
<p>Besides all that, my 13&#8243; MacBook is 13&#8243; for a reason - I can carry it around easily without a bag or case. It wouldn&#8217;t be practical for many people to carry modules with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.M.</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>O.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>A removable keyboard would be a great way to solve the localization problem: you could have the same MacBook with an English or a French keyboard, or many more as you need. 
This would also reduce the manufacturing cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A removable keyboard would be a great way to solve the localization problem: you could have the same MacBook with an English or a French keyboard, or many more as you need.<br />
This would also reduce the manufacturing cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menoum! (dvlp) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; InterchangeabilitÃ©</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Menoum! (dvlp) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; InterchangeabilitÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple a dÃ©posÃ© un brevet pour des interfaces interchangeables sur leurs laptops et le iPod. Avec ce concept, votre MacBook peut devenir un clavier midi, une console audio ou un jeu vidÃ©o et votre iPod peut devenir un tÃ©lÃ©phone ou un PDA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple a dÃ©posÃ© un brevet pour des interfaces interchangeables sur leurs laptops et le iPod. Avec ce concept, votre MacBook peut devenir un clavier midi, une console audio ou un jeu vidÃ©o et votre iPod peut devenir un tÃ©lÃ©phone ou un PDA. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menoum! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; InterchangeabilitÃ©</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>Menoum! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; InterchangeabilitÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple a dÃ©posÃ© un brevet pour des interfaces interchangeables sur leurs laptops et le iPod. Avec ce concept, votre MacBook peut devenir un clavier midi, une console audio ou un jeu vidÃ©o et votre iPod peut Ãªtre devenir un tÃ©lÃ©phone ou un PDA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple a dÃ©posÃ© un brevet pour des interfaces interchangeables sur leurs laptops et le iPod. Avec ce concept, votre MacBook peut devenir un clavier midi, une console audio ou un jeu vidÃ©o et votre iPod peut Ãªtre devenir un tÃ©lÃ©phone ou un PDA. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FotoKrazy.com &#187; Modular User Interface Patent by Apple</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>FotoKrazy.com &#187; Modular User Interface Patent by Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>[...] This is what is being described in the recent patent filled by Apple Inc. Read more from hrmph.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is what is being described in the recent patent filled by Apple Inc. Read more from hrmph.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/99/apple-proposes-blank-ipodphonemacbook-just-add-buttons#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>Noone seemed to notice haptic feedback in patent :
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#38;Sect2=HITOFF&#38;d=PG01&#38;p=1&#38;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&#38;r=1&#38;f=G&#38;l=50&#38;s1=%2220060026536%22.PGNR.&#38;OS=DN/20060026536&#38;RS=DN/20060026536</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noone seemed to notice haptic feedback in patent :<br />
<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220060026536%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060026536&amp;RS=DN/20060026536" rel="nofollow">http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220060026536%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060026536&amp;RS=DN/20060026536</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
