Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


The iPhone Nano closer than you think?

hrmpf on July 17th, 2007

The iPhone NanoRecently, chatter has increased about the possibility of an ‘iPhone nano’ (a smaller lighter more-iPod-than-iPhone phone). I have no informer in a Taiwanese factory, nor saw one over someone’s shoulder at an airport neither do I have a friend who is a waiter at a restaurant who played with one. But, what I do have is two patients which have a certain Steven P. Jobs as the lead inventor. As we’ve seen before Jobs is intimately involved of every aspect of product and stair development.

So what does Apple say about this low end iPhone?
The first patent application 20070152979 is for “Text Entry Interface for a Portable Communication Device”. This is important because a phone the size of an iPod Nano is not going to be able to incorporate a touchscreen or sophisticated input device in the immediate future- So it’s back to the future with a scrollwheel. How do you dial a number or send a text with a scrollwheel I hear you ask– the answer is: with some difficulty! Steve reckons using visual feedback on the screen you can use the scroll wheel to dial numbers. Further, text input will be aided by sophisticated predictive text.

The iPhone Nano

A method includes displaying a first tray and a second tray in a display of the portable communications device. The first tray is configured to display one of more characters that were selected by a user using a click wheel. The second tray includes a first plurality of icons that correspond to a set of characters and one or more recommended words. The first tray includes a first region in a graphical user interface and the second tray includes a second region in the graphical user interface. Scrolling through the first plurality of icons and the one or more recommended words occurs in accordance with one or more navigation commands received from a click wheel.

Text entry on the iPhone NanoWhat this means is anyone’s guess, but what I think it means is that you select letters with the scroll wheel in the first ‘tray’ at the bottom of the screen and then words are displayed in the second ‘tray’ which can then be selected and entered. The third ‘tray’ contains the text message already entered.

The second patent application 20070155369 with Steve as first inventor is the enigmatically named ‘Replay Recommendations in a Text Entry Interface
‘. Now, this patent makes you wonder how Steve can make so much sense in an Apple keynote but make so little sense in a patent abstract.

A method includes receiving a current set of characters in response to a sequence of user commands. The current set of characters includes a current sequence of words. A respective word in the current sequence of words includes one or more characters in the current set of characters. The user commands include character entry commands. Additional user commands that specify characters to delete from the current set of characters and characters to add to the current set of characters are received. Replay recommendations for additional words to be added to the current set of characters in accordance with one or more deleted words that correspond to the deleted characters are provided.

These two patents indicate that the concept of a iPhone Nano has been seriously thought about at the highest levels at Apple and that Steven P. Jobs has been central to developing these ideas. Whether this phone gets made probably will have more to do with whether Apple thinks it can sell lots of them without eating into its other markets the iPhone and the iPod. Time will tell.

I’m a fan of the iPhone Nano, maybe all phones don’t have to be the swiss army knives that they are being made into and there is room for a phone that is just a phone– or rather just a phone and an iPod. The problem with the market is that although people may have two iPods, an iPod video for watching video and to contain their entire music collection and a Shuffle or Nano, they are unlikely to have two phones mainly because they are not (at the moment) allowed to have the same number (maybe that could change?).
See the 2008 Tour de France with BikeStyle Tours



Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

There’s no particular significance to having Jobs’s name on the patent. Jeff Bezos’s name is on all Amazon patents, too.

Patent law requires that the names of all inventors be on the patent application, and you’re an inventor if you were involved in even a minor way with the idea. If the patent is challenged (or if the company tries to enforce it in court) and it turns out that an inventor was omitted (challengers can get all kinds of internal documentation via discovery motions to cast doubt on the patent’s accuracy), then bye-bye patent.

So in practice, anybody who would have been in meetings where the patent was discussed, and who might have made any comments whatsoever that could be interpreted as having contributed to the idea gets his name on the patent.

Regarding the abstract nature of Apple’s patent language: The goal of a good patent attorney is to get each patent granted with the broadest possible language. This can be quite useful in future patent infringement suits.

Wow. Now that’s just dumb.

t was already a risky step forcing people to “trust” iPhone’s predictive text… now they have to force you to trust it (it’s a slightly different system… you see the predictions onscreen) as well as use a new input method. People are definitely going to be turned off by that, no matter how nice the phone looks. It’s just like the whole “There’s no right click on Macs” thing. People don’t want to approach and learn something radically new or different, at least not without a lot of hesitation.

But in comparison to the right click thing, this is big. This is fundamentally changing the way you use the device, and I don’t think many people will be too happy with that.

Not only is there no keypad, but there’s no softkeys. I imagine the Prev/Next buttons will act as those, but then what about music playback? Isn’t this thing supposed to have an iPod in it?

I mean, I’m all for Apple being different, but that different? No touchscreen, fine, at least make it cheap, but give it a regular keypad for goodness’ sake.

I’ll be sticking with Sony Ericsson. Lets hope the next iPod is touchscreen.

This doesn’t seem to be too user friendly. I would love to see Apple produce a lower price phone/ipod but I’m not so sure this one would be the one.

Just a note to people who think you can’t right-click on a Mac, you can. Any three button mouse works, or hold down the Control key and click.

[...] Via: Hrmpf. [...]

Really guys, there is nothing to see here. I would be very surprised if this comes about anytime soon? Why would Apple de-value their own iPhone brand by dropping a cheep-o iPhone nano? THis doesn’t make sense. The patents are for one reason- prevention. Apple (Microsoft, IBM, etc.) has to write hundreds and thousands of patents every year just to cover themselves from patent trolls. That is all this is. Protection.

Sorry, guys.

[...] The above image is a composite of artist concepts based on the recent Apple patents, taken from this article on Hrmph.com, which details the patents themselves as well as further speculation surrounding exactly what the iPhone Nano might look like and what the potential downgrades in features would represent. [...]



s